Sunday, March 23, 2014
Appearance of iPSCs–Different Reprogramming Stages within the Same Well
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Picture Blog: A Short Path from Human mRNA-iPSCs to Neurons in Record Speed
Saturday, November 16, 2013
New Allele Biotech Publication on Stem Cells
Current Protocols in Stem Cell Biology • November 13, 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9780470151808.sc04a06s27
This unit describes a feeder-free protocol for deriving induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from human fibroblasts by transfection of synthetic mRNA. The reprogramming of somatic cells requires transient expression of a set of transcription factors that collectively activate an endogenous gene regulatory network specifying the pluripotent phenotype. The necessary ectopic factor expression was first effected using retroviruses; however, as viral integration into the genome is problematic for cell therapy applications, the use of footprint-free vectors such as mRNA is increasingly preferred. Strong points of the mRNA approach include high efficiency, rapid kinetics, and obviation of a clean-up phase to purge the vector. Still, the method is relatively laborious and has, up to now, involved the use of feeder cells, which brings drawbacks including poor applicability to clinically oriented iPSC derivation. Using the methods described here, mRNA reprogramming can be performed without feeders at much-reduced labor and material costs relative to established protocols.
Thursday, September 12, 2013
mRNA Delivery And the Next Wave of Regenerative Medicine
Zangi et al. Nature Biotechnology, http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nbt.2682.html
Abad et al. Nature, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nature12586.html
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Allele Biotech Receives $200,000 Grant to Update Its mRNA Reprogramming Commercial Products and Services
Saturday, March 30, 2013
Allele Publishes mNeonGreen as the Brightest Monomeric Fluorescent Protein for Super-resolution Imaging
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Allele Biotechnology Initiates Project On Scaled Manufacturing Of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells And Differentiation With Chinese Academics
Friday, December 14, 2012
American CryoStem Corporation (OTCQB:CRYO), announced the launch of its newest adult stem cell and adipose tissue collection center in Bellevue, Washington
Monday, December 10, 2012
NIDA Branch Chief, Jonathan D. Pollock, Ph.D., Encourages SBIR/STTR Grants on Reagent Kits Including iPSC
“What we’re really looking for is products that you could basically commercialize coming out of research. These can be things that are either products or services. I think that there are opportunities, particularly for groups of individuals that have an idea, IP, and want to have a startup company.”
SBIR/STTR grants account for 2.8% of NIDA’s roughly $1 billion annual budget. NIDA spent $26.679 million on SBIR and STTR in fiscal year 2012, which ended September 30—up from $26.497 million in FY 2011. The number of SBIR/STTR research projects grants rose to 56 in FY 2012 from 44 a year earlier, according to the GEN article.
Monday, October 8, 2012
The 2012 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine is Awarded to Cell Reprogramming Scientists
Sunday, September 16, 2012
Allele Biotechnology Announces New advance in production of human stem cells
Jiwu Wang, Ph.D., 858-587-6645 Ext 3
President and CEO
iPS@allelebiotech.com
fax: 858-587-6692
www.allelebiotech.com
Press release by BusinessWire. Also see Yahoo!News, Reuters, The Herald, etc.
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Development of Cell Lines from iPSCs for Bioassays
Take cardiomyocytes as an example. There are a number of conventional methods for inducing stem cells into cardiomyocytes: through embryoid body (EB) formation, co-culturing with visceral endoderm-like cell line (END-2), and monolayer caridomyocyte differentiation with defined growth medium and protein factors [3]. A recent publication showed that using appropriate concentrations of BMP4 and activin-A in BSA-containing medium cardiomyocytes might be achieved from iPSCs or ESCs in about 6 days [4].
Transdifferentiation, or direct reprogramming, by introducing a group of 3 cardiomyocyte-specific factors, investigators could directly program cardiac or dermal fibroblasts into cardiomyocyte-like cells [5]. Although much refinement and characterization of these directly reprogrammed cardiomyocyte-like cells, termed iCMs, will be needed before the process can become widely used, this work raised the possibility of quicker and perhaps more efficient ways of generating cells for assays. Similar transdifferentiation has resulted in induced neuron (iN) cells, also by introducing 3 tissue-specific transcription factors [6]. Therefore, it seems that by using defined combinations of tissue-specific transcription factors it is possible to generate cells of different tissue types. It is also possible that by using different, developmental stage-specific transcription activator sets, transdifferentiation can be conducted in a stepwise way and make sure cells at each step is pure. This strategy may be particularly attractive if its efficiency can be improved by the techniques developed for iPSC creation. After all, reprogramming to pluripotency and transdifferentiation to different tissue types must share certain mechanistic steps in their respective processes.
In addition, it has been reported that by briefly overexpressing the Yamanaka iPS factors and controlling growth conditions, mouse fibroblasts could be transdifferentiated up to 40% in 18 days without reversing back to pluripotency [7]. It would be interesting to see if by transient expression of iPS factors via mRNA then switching to cardiomyocyte-specific transcription factors, we can increase the efficiency for direct reprogramming. Use of chromatin-modifying chemicals that were already shown to directly reverse and alter cell fates might also be used to assist direct reprogramming. We believe that a systematic approach for studying these reprogramming aspects should benefit the iPS fields.
1. Takahashi, K. and S. Yamanaka, Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 2006. 126(4): p. 663-76.
2. Yu, J., et al., Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science, 2007. 318(5858): p. 1917-20.
3. Vidarsson, H., J. Hyllner, and P. Sartipy, Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to cardiomyocytes for in vitro and in vivo applications. Stem Cell Rev, 2010. 6(1): p. 108-20.
4. Elliott, D.A., et al., NKX2-5(eGFP/w) hESCs for isolation of human cardiac progenitors and cardiomyocytes. Nat Methods, 2011.
5. Ieda, M., et al., Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors. Cell, 2010. 142(3): p. 375-86.
6. Pang, Z.P., et al., Induction of human neuronal cells by defined transcription factors. Nature, 2011. 476(7359): p. 220-3.
7. Efe, J.A., et al., Conversion of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using a direct reprogramming strategy. Nat Cell Biol, 2011. 13(3): p. 215-22.
New Products of the week: T7 RNA Polymerase, high quality for demanding in vitro transcription requirements.
Promotion of the week: GFP-Trap, buy 2 of any package and get 1 of equal or less value free. Use code FreeTrap, follow deals quickly on Facebook.
Saturday, October 29, 2011
Creating ground-state human iPSCs
Sunday, May 29, 2011
Mouse and human cells can both be reprogrammed with one cluster of specific miRNAs
Sunday, May 22, 2011
mRNA Transfection for Better Transgene Expression
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Telling Good iPSCs from Bad iPSCs
Since its discovery pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have been known to differ somewhat from embryonic stem cells (ESCs) in term of gene expression profiles. It also appears that only a small percentage of iPSCs have the full potential of stem cells defined by being able to develop into adult animals. Instead of a global pattern of variations, surprisingly, the difference between iPSC and ESC was found to localize in a small region of one chromosome in mouse, 12qF1, which could account for most iPS cells’ lack of complete pluripotency (Stadtfeld et al, Nature 2010). In this region resides an imprinted gene cluster that includes 2 non-coding genes, Gtl2 and Rian, that remain silenced in most iPSCs. The underlining mechanism is hypermethylation and hypoacetylation, resulting in “paternalizaition” of the region. The effects are manifested around the mid-gestation stage.
By adding histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) the silenced gene cluster may be reactivated and the iPSCs so treated show increased Gtl2 expression and ability to give rise to normal embryos. Expression of other imprinted genes showed clone-to-clone variations, as was previously reported by a number of groups, but no consistent differences between ESCs cells and iPSCs. Therefore, by analyzing the expression levels of just two genes, Gtl2 and Rian, the potential of iPSCs to be fully pluripotent can be assessed.
The relationships between stem cell status and epigenetic repressions also include the recent finding that Oct4 and Sox2, which are both germ cell-specific and critical reprogramming factors, may be implicated in the regulation of Xist and Tsix RNAs that control epigenetic silencing of X chromosome in female embryos.
New Product of the Week 05-17-10 to 05-23-10: RT-PCR primer set, ABP-SC-iPSh4NX $49, for identifying exogenous iPS factor expression from 4-in-1 iPS lentivirus
Promotion of the Week 05-17-10 to 05-23-10: $85 off IceCube dry bath 0-75C variable temp
Friday, May 14, 2010
Mouse induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) differ from embryonic stem cells with aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1
Not all iPS cells can develop into adult animals, and one of the main reasons seems to be that regions of chromosomes remain silent in most iPSCs, according to a recent Nature paper by Hochedlinger and colleagues. "We found that a segment of chromosome 12, containing genes important for fetal development was abnormally shut off in most iPSCs," Hochedlinger said in a press release. "These findings indicate we need to keep improving the way we produce iPSCs and suggest the need for new reprogramming strategies." It sounds like that reprogramming typically employed to reverse differentiation fails to activate come imprinted genes. It would make sense to include factors that can help activate imprinted genes to the reprogramming mix to have "better" iPS cells.
The good news is that by using the only 1 out of some 60 iPSC clones, this group of researchers was able to create an adult mouse. They will now look into whether human iPSCs have similar properties as their mouse counterparts.
Original publications: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature09017.html
BioTechniques Review : http://www.biotechniques.com/news/Induced-pluripotent-stem-cells-create-first-living-animal/biotechniques-273626.html
Allele News
Friday, January 29, 2010
Monitoring the Undifferentiated Stage of Stem Cells—the Pluripotency Markers
To identify pluripotency of stem cells, expression of stem cell-specific marker genes (i.e. Oct-3/4, Sox2, Nanog, Rex-1) is monitored by RT-PCR. Alkaline phosphatase activity and methylation profiles of promoters of pluripotency-relevant genes are often analyzed as well. Compared to murine cells, it is noticeably more difficult to obtain human iPSCs, of which stem cell-like colonies sometimes turn out not to be pluripotent cells. We highly recommend testing iPSCs, especially human iPSCs, with antibodies against stage-specific embryonic antigens such as SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-1-60, and TRA-1-81.
Clink here to read what research reagents are available from Allele Biotech
New product of the week 01-25-10 to 01-31-10:
All-In-One-Vector: Human OSKM Lentiviral Paticles, with Oct-4, Sox-2, Klf, and c-Myc all expressed from a single virus, ready-to-use.
Promotion of the week:
human iPS cell detection primer set, the same as the landmark Yamanaka paper [4] on creating human iPS for the first time.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Allele Biotech Pre-Announces its Product Line in iPSC Creation Using Baculoviral Vectors
Allele Biotech R&D team welcomes any suggestions and discussions on the research plan and the resulting products. Comments can be made at the blog, through comments on this news, or directly to us through emails.
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Retroviral Vectors with Integrated oriP/EBNA1 for IPSC
By using the oriP/EBNA1 episomal system, reprogramming cDNAs can be expressed at prolonged time period in reference to plasmid transfection, without integration into chromosomal DNA. A paper published in PLoS One on Sep 18, 2009 by Marchetto et al. showed that by using such a system (on different plasmids) the authors were able to create induced pluripotent stems cells (iPS cells,) effectively from human embryo neural precursor cells.
The Allele pCHAC-EBNA system has dual functions: it can be ready-to-use plasmids for episomal expression of Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc, Klf4, or Nanog and Lin28 by a simple transfection into target cells; it can also be packaged into retroviruses by transfecting into the Allele Phoenix Retrovirus packaging Eco or Ampho cells. This product group is officially launched today. It should become a highly convenient and unique tool for iPSC-related studies.
